Bill R K and the Latin versus English consensus
>Your query: "would you admit to a Latin consensus being >God's word in its entirety as well?">>That is, you ask me if an incomplete, regional, >agreement in readings is necessarily...
View ArticleRe: Bill R K and the Latin versus English consensus
You have successfully pointed it out again. Still, you haven't pointed out why I'm wrong. The TR is God's doing. It indeed is the universal NT. The KJV is the universal English Bible. Manuscript...
View ArticleRe: Bill R K and the Latin versus English consensus
Quote:The KJV is God's word. You are welcome to disagree. Help yourself.andQuote:While I'm at it, the Dallas Cowboys are the all-time greatest football team. Texas is the most beautiful country in the...
View ArticleRe: Bill R K and the Latin versus English consensus
> The TR is God's doing. It indeed is the universal NT.Yes well, we see that you won't touch with a 40ft pole the question of "universal among whom"?Because clearly it wasn't universal among every...
View ArticleRe: Bill R K and the Latin versus English consensus
> The TR is God's doing. It indeed is the universal NT.If the TR is truly the "be all end all" then you might as well pick up that NKJV and transform into a NKJVOist! This type of transformation...
View ArticleRe: Bill R K and the Latin versus English consensus
Sometimes the KJV 1611 translators rightly deviated from the Hebrew text (Bg, BHK, BHS) in favor of a reading supported by strong non-Masoretic authority. When they were justified in doing so, we...
View Article
